The most obvious
answer to me would be that digital history is using the new technologies that
are expanding every day in a way that helps to share history. At least
that was what I thought before I did my reading. It turns out that there
is much more to digital history than just using technology to further history
as we know it. The problem for digital history isn’t just getting the
history out on the web, but the amount and quality of the history that is
already out there.
Having been a college
student for the past few years, I guess I have taken for granted the databases
like JSTOR and ProQuest that were available to me through my library’s
website. Through these I could search to
my heart’s content to find that one scholarly article I would need to prove my
thesis for my research papers. What I
didn’t realize, or I guess really think about, was that these databases don’t
come cheap. There are hefty fees that
libraries have to pay to allow their patrons access to these wonderful
scholarly articles. Also, the general
public definitely does not have access to these resources. I usually have to enter my school username
and password at least twice before I can even gain access to the papers I need
(which makes me wonder why I didn’t think about being able to access these
things when I am no longer a student).
In another article on TechNewsDaily brought up a point of history in our time
that I had never even considered. Almost
everyone in my generation has an online presence. We have Facebook, Twitter, and (though we
cringe at it now) MySpace pages to record our lives for our friends and
ourselves. At least that was what I had
always thought I had been doing. It
turns out that, without even realizing, we are creating an almost second by
second memoir of the daily life of the average person in the early 21st
century. Historians of the future won’t be struggling to find proof to back up
their theories about us, they will have too much to go through.
But then again, they may never have access to it
at all. Twitter saves every single tweet.
In effect, Twitter has created a timeline of sorts that stores our reactions to
world events. The problem is that
Twitter owns all of them. It is hard for
some families of deceased loved ones to gain the passwords to Facebook or email
accounts, let alone some unrelated historian of the future. With our lives so readily available for all
to easily read online, could it be that the future will know very little
because of companies protecting “our privacy” long after we are gone? Sadly, we won’t know the answer to this
question, but here is to hoping that we all will a historian our Facebook
password so that he or she can include our life in their future work.
My sources:
Digital History by Daniel J. Cohen & Roy Rosenzweig, Introduction and Chapter 1
Thoughtful post. KLC
ReplyDeleteI think that the over abundance of information is definitely going to be a problem for future historians who wish to study our time period. I'm betting information archived by sites like Twitter and Facebook will be available for purchase to libraries of the future. How cool would that be?
ReplyDeleteI wonder if there is a gadget or app that can show a graphical representation of a user's tweets in something like a time line. That would be a fascinating tool to see change over time and simple if Twitter keeps them all anyway.
ReplyDelete